This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2022-01 V2 Resource Holders Address
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Jun 20 08:20:51 CEST 2022
Just a brief point. I previously noted here that RIPE's rules requiring unanimity or near unanimity in order to declare "consensus" with respect to any given proposal has recently been recognized, by some EU politicians at least, as being a material impediment to forward movement on various issues. I only just noted that this growing sentiment has now apparently extended even to the Chancellor of Germany: https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1538637496124317704 My hope, of course, is that RIPE and its various WGs are taking notes. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2022-01 V2 Resource Holders Address
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]