This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] personal data in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] personal data in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] personal data in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis walker
ripedenis at gmail.com
Mon Jun 6 18:26:58 CEST 2022
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 at 17:57, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > > Always a useful thing to do if you want to block all resources held by a single actor or set of actors. So are you saying that you DO use the ORGANISATION object address to match resources held by different members at the same location? If so there are technical ways to offer that functionality within the database without exposing the full address of natural person members. cheers denis proposal author > > --srs > ________________________________ > Denis walker <ripedenis at gmail.com> > > you attempt some kind of heuristics with the free text search in the database to match up resources with the same address.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] personal data in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] personal data in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]