This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Jul 23 20:24:53 CEST 2022
Hello, I see it as useful. Not all CSIRTs are "purely virtual teams". We do have headquarters and hence a postal address. I would say the majority of established CSIRTs has a postal address. I don't have a strong opinion if the postal address should be mandatory or optional, though. A letter (sent by post) might reach different people that might then call the attention of other folks that didn't read or reply to an e-mail message... Cheers, Carlos On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Alexander Talos-Zens wrote: > Hej, > > >> usefulness (or not) of a mandatory postal address in the IRT object. > > If I can't reach someone by electronic media, I doubt I'd get better > response to snail mail. Furthermore, purely virtual teams might not > have a true physical location at all. > > Cheers, > > Alexander Talos-Zens > > -- > Alexander Talos-Zens > IT-Security - ACOnet-CERT > Zentraler Informatikdienst > https://zid.univie.ac.at > > > Universität Wien > Universitätsstraße 7 > 1010 Wien > T +43-1-4277-14351 > at at univie.ac.at > GPG-Key-Id: 0x757A494B > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] postal address in IRT objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]