[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal: Publish effective users' abuse-c

Hi,

On Fri 21/Jan/2022 19:40:40 +0100 denis walker wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 13:03, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote:
>>
>> The idea is to add extra addresses to assignment objects, irrespective of the
>> resource holder, based on the wish of its customer who is actually connected to
>> the resource.  Would that be at all possible?
> 
> When you say " irrespective of the  resource holder, based on the wish
> of its customer" do you mean without their consent or control? That is
> not possible as they maintain the assignment object. I would also say
> it is not desirable. That would allow an abuser to override the
> resource holders abuse-c and ignore all abuse reports.


Yes, I meant extra attributes linked to the assignment object.  If it's not 
possible let's just forget it.


>> And, if yes, would it be acceptable by the resource holder or are there
>> contractual impediments? Finally, if feasibility is ok, would operators
>> take advantage of it or is it only me? >
> If you are talking about adding extra abuse addresses to assignment
> objects by agreement with the resource holder, as I explained, that is
> possible now by simply adding an abuse-c to the assignment .


Except that I don't have write access to the assignment object.


Best
Ale
--