[anti-abuse-wg] Anti-Abuse Training: Questions for the WG

Hi all,

On Mon 18/Oct/2021 18:40:06 +0200 Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> 
>> 3) If not, would there be other areas of Anti-Abuse training that would be of interest?
> 
> A lot of hosting providers aren’t LIRs, but are getting IP space from LIRs. Maybe providing materials that LIRs could share with their clients would help? There  seems to be a lot of ignorance out there.


There are also people who are not hosting providers, but host their own server(s) using a handful of IP addresses.  I know mailbox self-providers are an endangered species, but they may still happen to have an IP delegation w/o abuse-c.  And complainants may prefer to send reports to the top level delegate.  However, top level delegate may happen to have non-responding abuse teams.  At best, ISPs forward complaints to their clients.

Shouldn't there be a standard for automatically forwarding messages destined to abuse-c following a path similar to that of RFC 2317 delegations?  I'd love if AA training encouraged such behavior.


Best
Ale
--