This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] REPORT: DDoS-Guard - AS57724, AS262254, AS49612
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Cynthia Revström
me at cynthia.re
Thu Feb 18 13:40:03 CET 2021
Hi aa-wg, For some context, today and yesterday I have been receiving spam in the form of fake abuse notices to my abuse contact email address. Is there a generally accepted standard for when it's okay to block an address or a prefix from emailing your abuse contact? I consider being able to contact the abuse email address of a network a rather important function, so I prefer not to block it. But also as I have more relaxed spam filters for the abuse contact to make sure nothing gets lost, it feels like blocking the address/prefix is my only option other than manually filtering through these emails (10 so far in total, today and yesterday). So back to the question, is there a generally accepted point at which blocking an address/prefix is fine? Thanks, -Cynthia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20210218/7c2c2850/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] REPORT: DDoS-Guard - AS57724, AS262254, AS49612
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question about spam to abuse inbox
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]