This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Final-ish Call for Agenda Items: AA-WG @ RIPE81
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Mon Oct 26 19:30:14 CET 2020
On Mon 26/Oct/2020 15:33:21 +0100 Alex de Joode wrote: > Jordi et al, > > I have to comment RIPE NCC and WGCC (and those that recused themselves). The > appeals process was used, the outcome reaffirmed the original decision. > > It's clear the proposal was fatally flawed. > > May I suggest we do not waist extra effort on this but accept the outcome and > instead of looking back, regroup and look forward? +1, there is more than just trying to rebuke non-compliant ISPs. Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Final-ish Call for Agenda Items: AA-WG @ RIPE81
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]