This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
PP
phishphucker at storey.ovh
Tue Oct 6 01:54:19 CEST 2020
Which then allows you to mistakenly claim there is or isn't consensus. Which itself is prone to abuse. On 6/10/2020 2:28 am, Brian Nisbet wrote: > All, > > I'm on leave from work this week and not checking this email a/c as > often as I normally would (or, hopefully, at all this week!), but I > wanted to pop in to clarify something. > > We do not vote on proposals in the RIPE community. We discuss them and > either consensus is reached or it is not. There is, therefore, no > calls for votes, nor counting of same. > > I would encourage everyone to read the material at > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies in order to gain a better > understanding of the process. > > Thanks, > > Brian > Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG > > Brian Nisbet > > Service Operations Manager > > HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network > > 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland > > +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie > > Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of PP > <phishphucker at storey.ovh> > *Sent:* Monday 5 October 2020 11:04 > *To:* anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> > *Subject:* Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the > Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of > “abuse-mailbox”) > CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the > organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you > recognise the sender and know the content is safe. > > You don't know that it was "marginal" support, because no count was > ever conducted. > > > The Chair never asked for a "vote", and then when people didn't "vote" > (because they had never been asked to), they concluded (wrongly) that > there was no support for the proposal. > > > > > On 5/10/2020 8:51 pm, Alex de Joode wrote: >> Jordi, >> >> The proposal received a lot of push back. Your statement "some clear >> support for the policy during the discussion phase", is missing the >> word "marginal" between some and clear. >> >> I believe the Anti-Abuse WG Co-Chairs made the right call. Please >> consider retracting your appeal. >> >> >> -- >> IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl <mailto:alex at idgara.nl> | >> +31651108221 >> >> On Mon, 05-10-2020 10h 23min, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ >> <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> <mailto:jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> This appeal (attached in PDF) follows the process outlined by >> ripe-710 (RIPE PDP). >> >> >> Regards, >> Jordi >> @jordipalet >> >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.theipv6company.com >> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theipv6company.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca2a4a12e445d4c10fa4308d869160918%7Ccd9e8269dfb648e082538b7baf8d3391%7C0%7C0%7C637374890673962409&sdata=NQ%2FgJyz%2BpjWRO1Xh0PUGPmm7thiUh3jeEpAGLaYiRGw%3D&reserved=0> >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be >> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for >> the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further >> non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or >> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, >> including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be >> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended >> recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or >> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, >> including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be >> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original >> sender to inform about this communication and delete it. >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20201006/6d08a8e3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]