This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
PP
phishphucker at storey.ovh
Mon Oct 5 12:04:04 CEST 2020
You don't know that it was "marginal" support, because no count was ever conducted. The Chair never asked for a "vote", and then when people didn't "vote" (because they had never been asked to), they concluded (wrongly) that there was no support for the proposal. On 5/10/2020 8:51 pm, Alex de Joode wrote: > Jordi, > > The proposal received a lot of push back. Your statement "some clear > support for the policy during the discussion phase", is missing the > word "marginal" between some and clear. > > I believe the Anti-Abuse WG Co-Chairs made the right call. Please > consider retracting your appeal. > > > -- > IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl | +31651108221 > > On Mon, 05-10-2020 10h 23min, > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This appeal (attached in PDF) follows the process outlined by > ripe-710 (RIPE PDP). > > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for > the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further > non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use > of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a > criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents > of this information, even if partially, including attached files, > is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so > you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20201005/f062cad1/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] [policy-announce] Appeal against the Anti-Abuse WG Co-chairs decisions on proposal 2019-04 (Validation of “abuse-mailbox”)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]