This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Thu Nov 12 18:06:55 CET 2020
Hi Tobias,
On Thu 12/Nov/2020 16:28:58 +0100 Tobias Knecht wrote:
>
> Please see the draft minutes from our Anti-Abuse Working Group Session in
> 127.0.0.1. Please let us know about any objections or necessary corrections asap.
Maybe it's me, but I cannot quite parse this sentence:
From his own work experience, he confirmed that abuse handling is
considered a security incident, there is a need for documentation
to be able to convince managers.
Perhaps "if abuse handling is to be considered a security matter..."?
Best
Ale
--
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes from RIPE 81
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] IPv4 squatting -- Courtesy of AS44050, AS58552
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]