[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi Petrit, all,

Thanks a lot for the clarification. I only discovered that once I was working on the slide for tomorrow, as during the previous days discussion I always used my original word proposal document.

I had the feeling that some of the points that we discussed in the last days were misunderstood because there was a "reinforcement or duplication" of the policy text, while it was meant as a clarification.

I will make sure to clarify it tomorrow during the WG presentation.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 13/5/20 17:58, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Petrit Hasani" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de phasani at ripe.net> escribió:

    Dear colleagues,

    The proposer has alerted us to a mistake in the “Draft Document” prepared for policy proposal 2019-04:
    https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-04/draft

    The “Additional information” section in the draft document is part of the proposal and should not be included in the actual policy text.

    We will update the draft document to remove this section. This means that this section would not be part of the policy text if the proposal is accepted.

    Please note that the policy proposal itself is not changed - the "Additional information" section remains a part of the proposal:
    https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-04

    Kind regards,
    --
    Petrit Hasani
    Policy Officer
    RIPE NCC





    > On 28 Apr 2020, at 16:01, Petrit Hasani <phasani at ripe.net> wrote:
    > 
    > Dear colleagues,
    > 
    > A new version of RIPE policy proposal, 2019-04, "Validation of
    > "abuse-mailbox"", is now available for discussion.
    > 
    > This proposal aims to have the RIPE NCC validate "abuse-c:" information
    > more often and introduces a new validation process.
    > 
    > Most of the text has been rewritten following the last round of
    > discussion and the proposal is now at version 3.0. Some key points in
    > this version:
    > 
    > - The abuse-mailbox should not force the sender to use a form
    > - The validation process must ensure that the abuse mailbox is able to
    > receive messages
    > - The validation should happen at least every six months
    > 
    > You can find the full proposal at:
    > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-04
    > 
    > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
    > four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
    > feedback to the proposer.
    > 
    > At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
    > the Anti-Abuse Working Group Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the
    > proposal.
    > 
    > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
    > <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 27 May 2020.
    > 
    > Kind regards,
    > --
    > Petrit Hasani
    > Policy Officer
    > RIPE NCC
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.