[anti-abuse-wg] Response to ipabuseresearch at gmail.com

Elad, you **really** should stop spamming any mailing list and attacking
people on Twitter.



On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 9:53 PM bigpiggyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy--- via
anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote:

> Hello IP Abuse Research,
>
> Response to your questions, misunderstanding and false information at:
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2020-May/005747.html
>
> ----
> "Please refrain from attacking mods or claiming censorship w/o proof,
> provide logs or transparency into the issue or just state your case w/o
> personal attacks."
> ----
> Please refrain from writing false information to the readers, do you want
> a proof of a censorship ? it sounds reasonable to you ? I need too use a
> different email address in order to reply to you.
>
>
> ----
> "Do you have a draft RFC or any buy in from the IETF for
> your tracking packet proposal? Or is part of harnessing the power of the
> RIPE part of a larger campaign to alter the current process? When
> soliciting feedback, did any of the NIRs have pushback on this?"
> ----
> The draft is in my head and will be implemented through a roundtable if I
> will be elected.
>
>
> ----
> "Do Cisco, Juniper, Huawei and others have an estimate on how long it will
> take to develop the controls mentioned and integrate them / back port them?
> Are they willing to subsidize this upgrade or will this require public and
> private institutions around the world to update their BGP routers at their
> own expense?"
> ----
> No commercial company wil subsidize anything, the goal is that only
> firmware updates will be needed without any hardware upgrade and that
> through community pressure - through the roundtable - the routing equipment
> manufaturers in the roundtable will do what they need to do (implementation
> of their firmware according to the specfiications).
>
>
> ----
> "If this works you might should follow up with Bert Hubert to
> see if this solution can help fix the DNS Camel problem. I don't think he
> has explored this specific means of control."
> ----
> Bert is a member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus
> Project" (such as you are) and he is taking active actions for me not to be
> elected. He is against this solution because it came from me only because
> of his ego.
>
>
> ----
> "Both of your plans mention a large centralized infrastructure run by the 5
> RIRs which is managed "by regulated supervised Law Enforcement Agency (for
> example: Interpol) and not by an internet organization such as the RIRs or
> ccTLD registries." Is your proposal that we will create The Internet
> Police? Will they be overseen by the UN or the ITU?"
> ----
> This is incorrect, it is a "centralized" infrastructure exactly as the
> root DNS servers are a "centralized" infrastructure - exactly the same and
> everyone are happy with the root DNS servers spread over the world.
>
> Regarding:
> "which is managed "by regulated supervised Law Enforcement Agency (for
> example: Interpol) and not by an internet organization such as the RIRs or
> ccTLD registries."
>
> This is a completele lie and you are intentioanlly taking sentences out of
> their context!
>
> In the email spam solution, the only part of Interpol is to be in charge
> only for setting which domains are criminal domains
> (phishing/malware/virus/etc), remotely through an API, without any access
> to the system - the reason that Interpol should set it and not the 5 RIR's
> is because Interpol is regulated and supervised according to law and in
> Interpol all the countries of the world is/should exist so Interpol will
> not act as a political organization against any non-member country. The
> reason Interpol is written and not Europol is also the same - so there will
> not be any case of few countries in Europol against another country not in
> the region of Europol (and capability of censorship, digital warfare, etc)
> - so no politics will be involved here. And this criminals domains list
> will not be used for agenda / politics / hidden interests (just like "The
> Spamhaus Project" are doing anonymously).
>
> In the anti-abuse methods solutions, the only part of Interpol is
> regarding creating the signed honeypot templates, that's it, without any
> access to the system. The reason is that honeypot hacking will cause
> criminal implications - so the honeypot template must be 100% reliable and
> created by an organization which is supervised and is regulated according
> to law - so there will not be false positives.
>
>
> ----
> "When it comes to the
> body of the 5 RIRs, are the NIRs represented independently or do they
> maintain their own infrastructure?"
> ----
> The two solutions will be managed only by the 5 RIR's, the bgp anycasted
> infrastructure can be spread over internet organizations worldwide which
> are not controlled by governments (and that these internet organizations
> are in countries with strict privacy laws, without experience of violating
> privacy laws and with democracies).
>
> Respectfully,
> Elad
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200510/1e9c4781/attachment.html>