[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

In a case where the community is polarised to this extent it would be better to break with procedure and call a vote for once.  With member organizations represented by their abuse team heads, rather than IP / routing people, so that the organisation’s stance on this is clear.

From: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Date: Saturday, 9 May 2020 at 3:57 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>, anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Hi,

On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 01:12:32AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Has this even been put to a vote or is it the same group of extremely vocal RIPE regulars against it and the same group of extremely vocal security types for it?   Rough consensus has its limitations in such cases.

There is no voting.

It's either "there is sufficient support and counterarguments have been
adequately addressed" or "no consensus, rewrite or withdraw".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200509/04ac7902/attachment.html>