This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Preventing spoofed amplification DDoS attack and email spam
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Preventing spoofed amplification DDoS attack and email spam
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Testing - Replies to Other Threads Not Appearing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
IP Abuse Research
ipabuseresearch at gmail.com
Wed May 6 15:19:17 CEST 2020
Please refrain from attacking mods or claiming censorship w/o proof, provide logs or transparency into the issue or just state your case w/o personal attacks. I would like some additional details about the implementation of these plans. Quotes taken from referenced posts: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2020-April/003902.html https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2020-April/003902.html "I will harness all the power of Ripe and all of the 5 RIR's and all of the LIR's in the 5 RIR's so routing manufacturing companies will implement the below processes." Do you have a draft RFC or any buy in from the IETF for your tracking packet proposal? Or is part of harnessing the power of the RIPE part of a larger campaign to alter the current process? When soliciting feedback, did any of the NIRs have pushback on this? Do Cisco, Juniper, Huawei and others have an estimate on how long it will take to develop the controls mentioned and integrate them / back port them? Are they willing to subsidize this upgrade or will this require public and private institutions around the world to update their BGP routers at their own expense? If this works you might should follow up with Bert Hubert to see if this solution can help fix the DNS Camel problem. I don't think he has explored this specific means of control. Both of your plans mention a large centralized infrastructure run by the 5 RIRs which is managed "by regulated supervised Law Enforcement Agency (for example: Interpol) and not by an internet organization such as the RIRs or ccTLD registries." Is your proposal that we will create The Internet Police? Will they be overseen by the UN or the ITU? When it comes to the body of the 5 RIRs, are the NIRs represented independently or do they maintain their own infrastructure? On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 6:13 PM bigpiggyyyyyyy via anti-abuse-wg < anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I'm being intentionally moderated by the co-chair Brian without my replies > being approved for almost a week, all of it in order to intentionally > censor me for the near elections. > > My following technical solution will completely prevent any kind spoofed > ip packets and any kind of spoofed amplification DDoS attacks: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2020-April/003902.html > > Spoofed ip traffic is a source for internet abuse, as well as spoofed > amplification DDoS attacks. > > If I'll have the honor of being elected I'll work to have it implemented > at a global scale, as well as my following technical solution to prevent > email spam: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2020-April/003778.html > > A world without email spam will be a much more effective world, the time > it will save is enormous. I hope to receive the support of RIPE Anti-Abuse > Working Group for the above that will have a major impact on defeating > abuse in the Internet, instead of a block from Brian. > > Respectfully, > Elad > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200506/fa57b45f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Preventing spoofed amplification DDoS attack and email spam
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Testing - Replies to Other Threads Not Appearing
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]