[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi Petrit,

Petrit Hasani wrote on 20/07/2020 18:46:
> The financial cost approximation of a proposal is not part of the
> Impact Analysis and the Policy Development Process, so we have not
> made a calculation. As too many factors have to be taken into account
> that we can't estimate realistically at this stage of the PDP. >
> I would like to clarify a couple of details that whilst re-editing
> the Impact Analysis seem to have become less clear. I am sorry about
> it:
> 
> - We estimate 10 times the amount of workload that is currently spent
> on abuse-c validation, not 10 times the amount of workload of the
> whole Registration Services Department.

ok, noted.  Regardless, this seems excessive, particularly in relation 
to the benefits that are alleged.

Separate to this, a bunch of the concerns raised on the mailing list 
over the last 18 months still haven't been addressed, despite over 500 
emails on the topic.

This proposal needs to be dropped.  It's very poorly specified, it adds 
little benefit and it seems to be excessively resource-hungry.

Nick