This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Jul 20 16:34:58 CEST 2020
Petrit Hasani wrote on 20/07/2020 14:07: > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this > four week Review Phase is to continue discussion of the proposal, > taking the impact analysis into consideration, and to review the full > draft RIPE Policy Document. This is the second most damning impact analysis I've seen the RIPE NCC write about any proposal, after 2019-03. The takeaways are roughly this: - up to 10x the number of tickets annually - ~10x the current number of staff required to handle the workload - the NCC will not enforce parts of the policy - ~3 months of retooling required Would it be possible for someone in the RIPE NCC to provide a reasonable cost estimate for hiring the 10x number of Registration Services personnel for the first 12 months of operation? A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that this will run into multiples of millions of €. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Review Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]