This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
info at fos-vpn.org
info at fos-vpn.org
Thu Jul 9 22:50:23 CEST 2020
Getting back to your street example. We -just like the police- are unable to watch the streets 24/7/365 for a potential bank robber traversing the street. Assuming that we lease the street and let others use it openly, we can only do our best to keep miscreants off it. It is however not a reason for anyone to declare the actual owner of the specific street, which owns hundreds of streets, as criminal! This would equal declaring every state criminal for supporting criminals in moving between places by providing streets. It is indeed unreasonable not to act at all, this is however nothing we ever stated. It is equally unreasonable never to remove SBL Listings which are not valid, can not be reproduced and merely serve the purpose of discrediting us and putting pressure on our upstream providers.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: Re: botnet controllers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]