This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Thu Jan 16 18:11:23 CET 2020
Hi All How about we just try this for a year and then take stock? Best Serge On 16/01/2020 18:07, Andreas Worbs wrote: > I'm completely with you. > > For our US-AS i verify my contact once a year: open the mail, click the > link, verify my data and that's it. You don't even need 5 minutes for it. > > If you have an automation fpr your abuse mails? Ok, you have to adjust > your configuration a little bit but you have to do this only once. Is it > really a problem? > > RIPE NCC will not deregister your ressources right now just because you > missed the verification. > > I would be happy if we have a mandatory abuse-c which is validated by > the RIPE. > > Rather go forward step-by-step than stop here for years. Stagnation > means regression. > > Have a good night, > > Andi > > Am 16.01.20 um 09:41 schrieb Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg: >> Hi All >> >> I think we already spent way more executive time on this thread than it >> would cost us to verify e-mail addresses. >> >> I agree e-mail does not solve all the problems. It's hard to >> automatically process, ..... >> >> But it is simple to use, and from my work as an incident handler it did >> do me good in the past. I participate in fora that validate >> abuse/emergency addresses. WHen I ask these people what their issues in >> daily life are it's never we have to validate or contact e-mail. >> >> >> And honestly: taking a step back and reading this entire thread, I'm not >> surprised that the bad guys are winning. You know: They don't care about >> the purty and beauty of a solution. They just do it and profit, and >> probably have a fabulous time seeing us argue and go at each others >> throats. >> >> I think we could do better. >> >> Best >> Serge > -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) Phone +41 76 542 44 93 | serge.droz at first.org | https://www.first.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200116/5567d51f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]