This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Jan 15 23:10:01 CET 2020
In message <CAPfiqjZkxVw7zJaSXb5mtg9_oB8nhXeU-_4rH+_tCWp3pv0=7g at mail.gmail.com> Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> wrote: >E-mail does not scale well. It was great in the 1990s, when the >Internet was smaller and people knew each other. About half the >world's population now has some sort of Internet connectivity. >Expecting organizations to be able to understand reports from such a >diverse group of people is unreasonable. You're right. Email is shit. However as long as network operators allow their errant end-lusers to spam me via email, I expect them to also accept reports about that via email. If they don't want to, then fine. They can just block outbound port 25 for their entire networks at and in the routers. Problem solved and everybody's happy. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]