This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Jan 15 22:41:54 CET 2020
Exactly 2 minutes a year (1 minute each time you click the link in the email from RIPE NCC). And because you invest 2 minutes a year, you will save a lot of time (many hours/days) yourself, trying to report abuses to invalid mailboxes! El 15/1/20 9:24, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> escribió: Hi Gert Sorry I misunderstood you then. But honestly, this does not really place a burden on you. RIPE can automate this, and you simply reply to a message. We do this, e.g. in TF-CSIRT twice a year, and it does help, event the good guys, that realize they have an issue and did not receive their mail. In fact, it's become a bit of a competition to be the first to reply to the challenge. So the extra work is what, 10 minutes / year, if the system is setup properly? So I think the balance is hugely positive. Just my two cents. Serge On 15/01/2020 09:18, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg wrote: >> I kind of don't buy into "There is no point on placing a burden on orgs >> that choose not to act". > > This is not what I said. My stance on this is: placing extra burdens on > orgs *that do the right thing today* (with extra verification hoops) > should be balanced against "will it change the situation wrt orgs that > do not care". > > And I think the balance is negative - extra work for the good guys, and > no relevant incentive for the bad guys to actually *act on* their abuse > reports. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) Phone +41 76 542 44 93 | serge.droz at first.org | https://www.first.org ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]