This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Wed Jan 15 18:09:10 CET 2020
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:16 AM Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: [...] > - Lastly: It makes our life as Incident responders easier to have a > uniform way of sending reports, even if not all of them are followed up. This is an excellent point but e-mail is probably not the right medium for that. Standardizing protocols for reporting abuse - and therefore acting on those reports more quickly - would be far more helpful. But only organizations don't want abuse on their networks will invest in the people, processes, and systems, whatever the reporting medium. > I kind of don't buy into "There is no point on placing a burden on orgs > that choose not to act". It's not about the burden on the organizations that don't want to act. It's about providing a clear signal to the reporting organizations that there is no point reporting. That should allow reporting organizations to decide on next steps more quickly.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]