[anti-abuse-wg] working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:11:23PM -0800, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:50 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg
> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I will love to have in the policy that they must be investigated and acted upon, but what I heard from the inputs in previous versions is that having that in policy is too much and no way to reach consensus ???
> 
> I don't understand the value of requiring organizations who do not
> intend to investigate abuse reports to spend resources publishing an
> address from which they can acknowledge the reports - only to then
> delete those reports without doing anything.
> 
> It creates hope for reporters and wastes the RIPE NCC's and the
> reporters' resources by forcing unwilling organizations to spend
> cycles on unproductive activity.

This.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200114/108e9dfc/attachment.sig>