[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

I can think of at least a dozen other such groups where most of the discussion is actually operational and on those topics.

The only reason I find it useful to be on this wg is to look at abuse issues specific to the ripe region

--srs
________________________________
From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 7:58:14 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com>
Cc: Sascha Luck [ml] <aawg at c4inet.net>; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote on 30/04/2020 14:07:
> What would get discussed in an anti abuse wg?

Carrots?  Almost all the discussion in AAWG seems to be single-tracked
on turning the RIPE NCC registry into a stick.

E.g. industry standards / best practices, liaison with other anti-abuse
groups, community engagement, measurement, etc.

Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200430/1b702b83/attachment.html>