This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Serge Droz
serge.droz at first.org
Wed Apr 29 13:44:42 CEST 2020
>> Coming from the incident response side, I'm tiered of people constantly >> telling me, that issues are not their problem > > How would this proposal help with said problem? > - It will catch the cases where some miss configuration happened indeed - It will make it impossible for orgs to say "We never received a report" - It allows us to enumerate better who does good work and who doesn't. And making this transparent will help showing thate there is an issue and maybe also be a motivation for people to change But I've said that before. Best Serge -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair of the FIRST Board of Directors https://www.first.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200429/ca466c05/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]