This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Fw: Re: @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fw: Re: @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fw: Re: @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vittorio Bertola
vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com
Fri Apr 17 13:02:18 CEST 2020
> Il 17/04/2020 12:33 furio ercolessi <furio+as at spin.it> ha scritto: > > Good morning, > > as everybody is certainly aware, the antiabuse scenario has become rather complex, Apologies if I jump into this discussion - I do not work for a RIPE member, I lurk this list to stay up to date with general abuse trends. But there is one thing that escapes me: if, as Ron asserts (and this needs to be proven), there is an ongoing attempt to put into the RIPE NCC Board one or more individuals that are connected with theft of IP space and other abuse, isn't this attempt a gigantic form of abuse in itself, with potential consequences that could go well beyond RIPE and its members and affect the European Internet community as a whole? Why should it not be in topic for the abuse list, and where is it in topic then? -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bertola at open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fw: Re: @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Fw: Re: @EXT: RE: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]