This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Fri Apr 17 09:03:06 CEST 2020
The we are not the internet police crowd for instance And the amazing number of ripe luminiaries, wg chairs etc that just happened to be in the room for an AOB session during a previous wg with the intention of voting Richard Cox out of his co chair position. There just doesn’t seem to be any actual interest in fighting abuse. And much more interest in coming up with interesting reasons as to why action must be taken by an undefined someone else in most every abuse case that is brought up. This wg is not meeting whatever role is defined in its charter I’m afraid --srs ________________________________ From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:25:51 PM To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election Hello List I've been, mostly passive, on this list for quite a while. I must say we really excel in terms of abusing each other. And I agree with Ronald, we seem to fail coming forward with even partial solutions to prevent abuse. I am disappointed by the tone on this list. One can, and should disagree on topics, but one should not loose the common goal, reduce abuse in our case. I fear we are doing just that. Maybe the striving for a perfect solution, that has no side effects is not the right approach. Criminals don't mind side effects, and maybe rather than avoiding them we should try to control and minimize them. While I'm not the right person to determine what topics are appropriate for the list, I don't see any harm in asking people to maybe consider viable candidates for board positions. We can discuss the tone. This group repeatedly pointed out the importance of a bottom up, democratic governance structure for RIPE. I'd argue, that a good selection of candidates for such a position is the basis for this. I would hope for the abuse WG to become a little more pragmatic and positive thinking when trying to come up with solutions to fight abuse. "Divide and conquer" is a concept criminals thrive on too. Having said that, I wish everyone good health and and a hopefully enjoyable weekend. Best Serge -- Dr. Serge Droz Chair of the FIRST Board of Directors https://www.first.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20200417/060d1ffb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Executive Board election
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]