[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 Discussion Phase (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 03:15:02PM +0100, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> I don't think it's a matter of authority, but only a matter of 
> understanding if the community wants to tighten the requeriments (or 
> not).

This part of the community does not want to increase the workload for
people handling abuse mailbox, for questionable results.

The general idea fails the most basic test "will it have a positiv effect, 
or will it just cause extra hurdles for those that already do the right
thing".

So, I do not agree with this proposal.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20191001/4fabf9d4/attachment.sig>