This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fearghas Mckay
fearghas at gmail.com
Thu May 23 03:10:21 CEST 2019
> On 22 May 2019, at 22:38, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > Before you all argue for "we need to have more paperwork!" please take > a step back and explain a) what is wrong with the current validation > process, and b) why this proposal would improve this. What Gert said - at the very least these need to be answered before this policy can gain consensus. I oppose the policy as written and proposed. Thanks f
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]