[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

So I don't know about other regions not having the same needs. APNIC has adopted this for example.

https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-125

--srs

________________________________
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Sérgio Rocha <sergio.rocha at makeitsimple.pt>
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 11:10 PM
To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

There are only one internet, the abuse problem its worldwide, the challenges for better management are the same, that's why all region are looking for the similar responses for the same problems. I support this proposals and other that give more capacity for RIPE deal with abuses.

Sérgio Rocha


-----Original Message-----
From: Piotr Strzyzewski [mailto:Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 18:32 PM
To: Sérgio Rocha <sergio.rocha at makeitsimple.pt>
Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37:07AM +0100, Sérgio Rocha wrote:
> > i.e. 1 region on track, 4 still to go (RIPE included here).
>
> So it looks that this proposal it's not so avant-garde, since the
> other regions are having the same needs and one of them already
> include this policy

The fact that the authori has proposed the same idea in all regions doesn't mean that "other regions are having the same needs".

Piotr

--
Piotr Strzyżewski
Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190522/eeb1b048/attachment.html>