This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Taras Heichenko
tasic at hostmaster.ua
Tue May 21 18:43:58 CEST 2019
> On May 21, 2019, at 19:31, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Hi Tarass, > > > El 21/5/19 16:18, "Taras Heichenko" <tasic at hostmaster.ua> escribió: > > > >> On May 21, 2019, at 18:35, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> El 21/5/19 15:32, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> escribió: >> >> Hi, >> >> the whole point of your policy is the underlying assumption that people >> are *not* acting in good faith, so why all of a sudden assume they are? >> >> Is in the other way around. If you're acting in good faith, you should not have a problem to have a validation. The time you invest in a couple of validations per year, will be *much less* than the time that you *now* invest in unusable abuse contacts. > > If you're acting in good faith you do not need the validation. So other people do not need to validate your abuse contact. > It just works. If you're acting in bad faith then additional validation will not change your behavior. You just check your > > ---->>> Right, but those folks *then* are violating the policy. They are _already_ acting in bad faith. Do you really think that it is reason for them to go to the good path? Do you have any way to prove that they are violating policy when you look at the address outside of the abuse mailbox owner, from RIPE NCC point of view? > > mailbox to reply to the validation. Nothing more. But the people who are acting in good faith will have additional headache to not > miss the validation to make all good. > >> >> Gert Doering >> -- NetMaster >> -- >> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? >> >> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer >> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann >> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) >> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >> >> >> >> >> ********************************************** >> IPv4 is over >> Are you ready for the new Internet ? >> http://www.theipv6company.com >> The IPv6 Company >> >> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Best regards > > Taras Heichenko > tasic at hostmaster.ua > > > > > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > > -- Best regards Taras Heichenko tasic at hostmaster.ua
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]