This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Tue May 21 13:03:43 CEST 2019
Hi Gert, I'm fine if it is outsourced to comply with the policy, of course, but not to circumvent it. I think any way to comply with policies is just fine if acting in good faith. Regards, Jordi El 18/5/19 19:03, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> escribió: Hi, On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 10:38:46AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > I have an idea. > > I will set up a service where everyone can have an e-mail address which > will totally follow everything you propose as validation mechanism - like, > click on tokes, report back in 10 minutes (even in the middle of the > night), etc. - LIRs that want to be spared this annoyance can just pay > me 50 EUR/month, and I'll handle all these chores for them. > > So, this would totally fulfill your proposed policy, and not help in any > bit with *abuse handling*. > > That automated system will be against the policy. I've already > worded it out in such way that is not possible this type of > "work-around the policy", at least it was my original intent to > avoid it. If I've broken something across more than 20 versions > that I edited internally since started, I will make sure to fix it > in the next version. Who said that this is automated? If enough LIRs give me 50 EUR/month, I can hire a few students who will sit there all day waiting for confirmation requests and dutifully do (as humans) what they are expected to do. You do not seem to be willing to listen: what you propose is sheer and uncalled-for extra annoyance for the vast majority of LIRs, and will do *nothing* to improve abuse handling. All it will do is ensure that someone wastes a few minutes of human lifetime on your challenge. And *that* can be nicely outsourced. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]