[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

In message <CALZ3u+Z4CVN0zj41kD69VEscYu=GVN=d-y=1ZjmuAJp0V8KJnw at mail.gmail.com>
=?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote:

>And yes, Kazakhstanian court also thinks IP addresses are property.  Do you
>consider yourself in a good company now?

I am not in a position to argue with the opinions of either Kazakhstan
coyrts or U.S. courts.

>IP addresses are a public shared resource.  They are a *policy*, not a
>property.

OK.  If you say so.

All I can say is that I realized, some years ago now, how little it matters
what we call things.

For years I have tried to persuade all of my friends and family to call
my Honda automobile a Ferrari.  And some have obliged me.  I have noticed
however that despite this, the car's general attributes and its performance
characteristics have not changed one wit.


Regards,
rfg