This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Sat May 18 16:03:26 CEST 2019
On Sat, May 18, 2019, 3:44 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > If it weren't effectively property there wouldn't be firms listing large > blocks of v4 space as an asset while going out of business, and there > wouldn't be brokers specializing in acquiring and reselling this space. > If someone can sell something others may want to buy, it doesn't mean that what's being sold and bought is a property. There are people who are paying for some stars to have certain particular names in arbitrary private databases. "star-registration dot com" and such. IP addresses are essentially the very same thing. -- Töma > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190518/a2799347/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]