This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sat May 18 10:43:11 CEST 2019
El 17/5/19 10:41, "anti-abuse-wg en nombre de Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces at ripe.net en nombre de anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> escribió: Hi All, I'm not sure about the 6 month period (vs. 12 months), and probably some details can be improved in further versions, but i do support this proposal, which is clearly in the path of "anti-abuse". My team has nearly sent out 6000 abuse reports (only about intrusion attempts and brute force attacks) since Jan 1st this year. I've just checked, and only 2.5% bounced. 2018's bounces were around 4.5%. I guess that means that it is increasing. 2.5% is only for 5 first months of this year, so it may end up in 2019 you have 5-6% ? I've looked at my own network and the situation is even worst. Major number of abuse reports for me are intrusion attempts, attempts to use our SIP and SPAM. In total, the average number of abuse reports per month is about 3.800 (99% are automated). Bounces increase from previous year, average, is 23%. Maybe when we start to send out (automated) abuse reports about spam, the percentage will increase. We also send messages, globally, so solving the issue only in RIPEland will have limited impact. I've read this is already under implementation in another region, and proposed in the remaining 3 -- great! I also think some reference to the ARC (Assisted Registry Check) could be included in the proposal, and could work as a primary step well before going into other actions which can carry more impact. Regards, Carlos On Thu, 16 May 2019, Marco Schmidt wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-04, "Validation of "abuse-mailbox"", is now available for discussion. > > This proposal aims to have the RIPE NCC validate "abuse-c:" information more often, and introduces a new validation process that requires manual input from resource holders. > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-04 > > As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four-week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the proposer. > > At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of the Anti-Abuse Working Group Chairs, decides how to proceed with the proposal. > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 14 June 2019. > > Kind regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum > ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]