This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Taras Heichenko
tasic at hostmaster.ua
Fri May 17 19:01:40 CEST 2019
> On May 17, 2019, at 12:40, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists at gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, > > As I read the proposal cutting off bogus LIRs seems to be the goal rather than cutting off a legitimate but careless player. There seem to be quite a few such given the coming wg meeting has a preso on just this topic. I saw a lot of cases when visible goals after accepting have been converted to awful applying. There should be always considered the worst way of the policy applying. And when it is accepted people will find yet worse. > > --srs > -- Best regards Taras Heichenko tasic at hostmaster.ua
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]