[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:43:46AM +0100, Carlos Friaças wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:41:24AM +0100, Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> >> My team has nearly sent out 6000 abuse reports (only about intrusion
> >> attempts and brute force attacks) since Jan 1st this year.
> >> I've just checked, and only 2.5% bounced. 2018's bounces were around 4.5%.
> >
> > But this means the existing efforts from the RIPE NCC are showing an
> > effect, and we do *NOT NEED* a new policy with lots of extra complications.
> >
> > We do have abuse-mailbox verification, and we do have ARCs.
> >
> > Why do we need more process?
> 
> We might not need more processes, but hopefully improved processes :-)

There is no indication that the complications Jordi is proposing are
an actual improvement in any metric, except "human life time wasted".

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190517/a8ad9b58/attachment.sig>