[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Anything at all that gets used as a lever to deregister such an LIR and reclaim it's IPs will be a public service. If you have any other policy proposal that does this adequately I'm all ears. Till then faute de mieux..

--srs

________________________________
From: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:59 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cc: Gert Doering; JORDI PALET MARTINEZ; Brian Nisbet; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:24:51AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> With several countries in the RIPE region that have a major crime and corruption problem, no extradition or mlat treaties with the US or Europe and some that have used internet crime as a method of waging war in the past, it is the very last assumption you must base your policies on, let alone mailing list arguments.

And this proposal helps with this "major crime and corruption problem"
in exactly *which* way?

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190517/78b046f8/attachment.html>