[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")

Hi,

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:08:24AM +0000, Brian Nisbet wrote:
> > And, at least try the minimum amount of politeness in quoting according to
> > local customs.
> 
> Can we please let this particular one go? 

No.  We manage to do this on the APWG list just fine.

It can be done if people *care*.  And this caring is a matter of basic
politness, "if you enter a discussion, you follow style of the previous
speakers".

If the AAWG list is "we have no interest in politness towards people
who actually have to read what others write, and try to make sense out
of discussions with quoting", I will no longer *read* what is written
here, because it takes too much valuable lifetime.

Isn't this the place where we discuss about (very complicated) rules 
wrt e-mail abuse handling verifcation?  And we're not able to agree on
a basic set of rules for useful e-mail discussions?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190517/5cbe231d/attachment.sig>