This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Fri May 17 11:17:04 CEST 2019
Shane Kerr wrote on 17/05/2019 08:45: > All I can say is that the law is stupid then, and it SHOULD allow the > proposed policy. 😉 fundamentally, it shouldn't. Proportionality is a cornerstone of most legal systems - if you don't have proportionality, you end up with tyranny. The idea of threatening to cut off a LIR because they haven't updated an abuse contact is completely disproportionate to the scale of the policy infraction. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Legality of proposal (apologies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]