This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Mar 30 10:17:20 CET 2019
Hi, (being a working group member from Portugal and also one of the co-authors) Does the PDP specify that expressing support needs to include any specific reason for said support? Do supporters need to specify which parts of the proposal's text are more meaningful for them? Perhaps one of the Chairs can shed some light. Best Regards, Carlos ps: I hope there isn't even a glimpse of discrimination against Portuguese members here. I've also seen support coming from people that live in US, CZ, IL, CH, IN, NL. But this WG in not ITU-T, thus not country-based... On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Sergey Myasoedov via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > Dear group members from Portugal stated your support for 2019-03, > Can you please provide some more arguments than your humble "+1" statement? This is a working group, not a voting. > > Please. > > > -- > Kind regards, > Sergey Myasoedov > > On 29 Mar 2019, at 18:33, Vitor Leitao <vitor.m.leitao at gmail.com> wrote: > > I would like to manifest my support to the proposal 2019-03. > > Rgds, > > Vitor Leitao > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Proposal 2019-03 BGP Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]