This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Sun Mar 24 01:05:52 CET 2019
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Our intent is NOT to "stop" the attack with the claim (not efficient at all), > but to allow to be reviewed in order to avoid it, in the future, if possible > from the same actors. Not efficient at all. As demonstrated above in the thread, the same actors would then apply for a next LIR with a totally new commercial entity. At that point I don't understand anymore the problem you're trying to solve. -- Töma
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]