This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Sat Mar 23 16:49:16 CET 2019
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 23/03/2019 11:52: > El 23/3/19 12:32, "Nick Hilliard" <nick at foobar.org> escribió: > 1. it's not the job of the RIPE NCC to make up for a short-fall of civil > legislation in this area, no matter how distasteful we might find the > consequences of this; > > And we aren't doing that. If there were legislation and enforcement in this area, we wouldn't be having this conversation. > 2. you can throw anything into a contract, but that doesn't mean it's > enforceable or even lawful. > [...] > In this particular case, the suggestion is for the RIPE NCC to start > making judgements about potentially legal actions between second or > third parties, potentially involving non-related resources and to deny > and/or withdraw number registration services on that basis. This does > not sound legally enforceable. > > No, it is not a matter of parties. It is a matter of the membership rules. Jordi, you need to take legal advice on this before proceeding further. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]