[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 and over-reach

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 19:11 ac <ac at main.me> wrote:

> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 18:57:43 +0800
> Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
> > It’a very much because of internet has become part of unitiy to my
> > point of view.
> >
> > Any policy that says “if you do bad thing we taking your IP number
> > back” is very much like “if you do bad thing we cut your
> > water/electricity off”.
> >
> the point is: you can do what you like with "your ip", if it is "your
> ip" but part of what makes it "your ip" is an advertisement that is
> an assignment by an administrative power and the same
> administrative power comes with responsibility and a whole bunch
> of unavoidable and undetachable other things....
>
> so, we can keep going around in chicken and egg circles, but I think my
> mind is made up now... thank you for that :)
>
> I am +1 for adoption of 2019-03 as it stands...
>

Sure, so does my mind, I am -1 for the adoption.

Yes you do have responsibility to things you processe(in this case the
rights to use the IP), but doesn’t give you rights to policing other people
when your procession get damaged, I still firmly believe that rights belong
to the police and judges.

And for the record, it’s in my short term interest to have that policy as
we do suffer from time to time hijackings, and I made presentation in this
working group how more half million of our IP get hijacked for half a year.
But for the long term stability of the registry, or the internet as a
whole, in which in all my interest to protect, I really like to see
community avoid policy like that.





> Andre
>
>
>
> --
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190323/24d296d7/attachment.html>