This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Fri Mar 22 17:46:03 CET 2019
In most of the cases the NIRs are bound by the same policies as the relevant RIR, so this is not a big problem. We believe this policy is important for all the RIR communities (including NIRs), however, in general, when I find a problem that requires to draft a policy proposal for a given RIR, I usually check how it is solved or if it exist the same problem or also needs to be resolved in the other 4 RIRs, which, in many cases, means a single policy proposal turns into 3-4 (average). Not always same text as sometimes the existing text already solved it (even if only partially), or there are other differences (other policies affected, service agreements, membership by-laws, etc.), even cultural differences, etc. Regards, Jordi El 22/3/19 17:33, "Töma Gavrichenkov" <ximaera at gmail.com> escribió: On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:24 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > It has been already proposed/discussed in every RIR This is thrilling. What's the idea about dealing with the nine NIRs? You cannot just deny them membership, right? -- Töma ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]