[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)

> Isn't the whole point of route registries generally and RIPE's in particular
> supposed to be to make it easy for pretty much any arbitrary outsider to
> look at a given block and a given route to that block and conclude that
> the two -do- in fact properly go together, or conversely, that they do not?

That could be obviously only done after BGPSec and RPKI are fully
deployed, in which case we won't be needing the proposal in question.

See the "hypothetical example" in
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2019-March/004601.html

| Töma Gavrichenkov
| gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191
| mailto: ximaera at gmail.com
| fb: ximaera
| telegram: xima_era
| skype: xima_era
| tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58