This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
aawg at c4inet.net
Fri Mar 22 11:05:22 CET 2019
Hi Marco, On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:30:21PM +0000, CSIRT.UMINHO Marco Teixeira wrote: >While i understand this concern, i must say that communities that do not self-regulate, tend to be regulated from above, and that is (usually) not desirable. >I think no one is sugesting that RIPE be a regulator, but it should contribute to help the community self-regulate. I am no longer convinced that political regulation is undesirable. Historically, regulation through governments came about wherever self-regulation got out of hand and turned into abuse - and I believe that is what is starting to happen here. rgds, SL
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]