This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Mar 21 09:35:19 CET 2019
It isn't a criminal offence, hence the need for some self-regulation at RIR (book-keeping and distribution) level. Carlos On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:04:53PM +0000, Carlos Friaas wrote: >>> I don't think that word means what you think it does. "criminal" >>> has a very precise legal meaning. If you think that advertisement >>> of numbers is a criminal act, please provide jurisdiction, act >>> and article under which it is. >> >> Three words: "dutch", "court", "order" -- that's jurisdiction over RIPE >> NCC. > > Please state, precisely under which Dutch law advertisement of > numbers not assigned to you is a criminal offence (Who knows, > there might be one...) > > rgds, > SL >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]