[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:38:34AM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Ah that way. Then -
> 
> Do we have rough consensus? If not at what point is it reached?

Now this is left to the AA WG chairs to decide :-)

As per the RIPE PDP, we're in "discussion phase", which is run to the
end date Marco announced (too lazy to look it up).  Then, the proposers
decide together with the relevant WG chairs if they think it makes sense
to go ahead (it does not have to have consensus, but should have some 
amount of support, and no counter arguments that are compelling enough to
outright kill the proposal).  

If yes, the RIPE NCC does the Impact Analysis, and the proposal moves to 
review phase.

At the end of the review phase, the WG chairs determine rough consensus.

Here's a nice video about the phases

   https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies

plus the link to the formal document

   https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-710


Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20190321/b8bf2155/attachment.sig>