This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 04:06:01 CET 2019
Some individual mentioned dutch law and lawsuits. If that was not you please consider my comment a response to that individual. In my opinion we are long past the stage of rough consensus on this list. Take it to the WG and see if it gets consensus there and please spare the rest of the list some very pointless discussion. On 21/03/19, 8:27 AM, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg at c4inet.net> wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 07:06:40AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >The discussion does seem to be going in circles. A series of objections from Sascha and then various people countering it – none of whom appear to be lawyers of any stripe, discussing the legality (or not) of this proposal. Please state *precisely* where I've questioned the legality (under Dutch or any other law) of this proposal, or kindly refrain from misrepresenting my statements. rgds, SL
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]