This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Mon Mar 18 13:13:44 CET 2019
On Sat 16/Mar/2019 21:15:22 +0100 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > First, I am inclined to wonder aloud why anyone is even still peering > with any of the several ASNs mentioned in the report. To me, the mere > fact that any of these ASNs still have connectivity represents a clear > and self-evident failure of "self policing" in and among the networks > that comprise the Internet. RIRs cannot themselves enact block lists such as Spamhaus DROP. However, those ASNs could well make their way to such lists. Why don't they? Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Webzilla
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]